Effective October 1, 2012 any person convicted of certain misdemeanors and all felonies in New York will be required to provide a sample of their DNA. New York is the first state to require DNA samples based on convictions under these guidelines. DNA sampling will be required by any person who is found guilty of a crime after trial or if the person pleads guilty to a crime.
In 2006, New York first enacted Deoxyribonucleic Acid (“DNA”) sampling for persons convicted of a limited number of felonies, attempted felonies and 18 specific misdemeanor offenses. Since passing the sampling law in 2006, New York State charged 1,595 crimes based on “hits” from people convicted of qualifying crimes after submitting DNA. The increased number of arrests prompted legislation to increase the qualifying sampling offenses to include all felonies, attempted or otherwise and all Penal Law misdemeanor convictions. Executive Law § 995(7).
If a qualifying offender is sentenced to jail or prison, a DNA sample will be collected by the government agency which has custody of the individual. Executive Law § 995(7)(3)(B)(I). If the designated offender is sentenced to probation, then the probation department will be required to collect the sample. Executive Law § 995(7)(3)(B)(II). Finally, if a qualifying offender is not sentenced to probation or incarceration then the local Sherriff’s Department is charged with collecting the DNA sample. Executive Law § 995(7)(3)(B)(III).
All collected samples will continue to be stored by the Department of Criminal Justice Services (“DCJS”). The database created by DCJS in 2006, with the passing of the first DNA sampling statute, will expand to include the new qualifying crimes. Persons who successfully overturn a conviction may have their DNA removed from the database. Executive Law §995(9)(a).
Thus, beginning October 1, 2012, any person convicted for any one of the 155 Penal Law misdemeanors, regardless of severity, will be forced under the new law to provide a DNA sample to the State of New York. Significantly, even persons convicted of traditionally petty crimes such as, bouncing a check or attempted petit larceny will be required to submit their DNA. Any person accepting a plea to a qualifying crime should fully understand this new collateral consequence.
A special thanks to Rachel Maier and Kelly Slossar for their contributions to this article.
 The class “B” misdemeanor of Attempted Possession of Marihuana is excluded as a qualifying offense under the new law.
© 2013 The Law Office of James L. Riotto – Attorney Advertising
The Law Office of James L. Riotto
30 West Broad Street, Suite 306, Rochester, NY 14614
"All of my contact was handled very promptly and professionally. They were very knowledgeable and made me feel like my case was as important to them as it was to me."
"I highly recommend the Law Office of James L. Riotto. The entire staff is professional, knowledgeable and always willing to help. Mr. Riotto’s legal prowess coupled with his background in law enforcement give him the ability to be empathetic to his client’s circumstances while relentlessly striving for the best possible outcome."
"Everyone I’ve talked to in this office has always been kind and very helpful. I’ve used them a couple of times now and am very happy with the outcomes and how well they’ve communicated with me."
"I would like to say what an amazing job your office did for me. Your team really saved me and helped me save costs. I want to give a shout out to an amazing person who worked tirelessly for me.. Chelsea Gardner!! She is awesome. James, I tell everyone I know to call you and your team. True professionals and they do what they say!!"
"Mr. Riotto was very responsive to us on our initial call as throughout the legal process. It was very clear how he was approaching the case and what the outcome may be. It can be unsettling hiring an attorney we did not know. He very quickly put our minds to rest."