Search Site
Menu

N.Y. Prosecutors Must Share Discovery with Defendants Sooner and Without Prompting

A major overhaul of New York’s criminal law now requires prosecutors to share key information and evidence with defendants automatically and to do so much earlier in the pretrial process. The reforms, which took effect January 1, 2020, mark a major change in New York’s discovery law — once dubbed the “blindfold law” because it kept many defendants from seeing critical evidence.

The term “discovery” refers to the procedure by which prosecutors reveal the information and evidence in their possession as well as to the material itself. Discovery can include the names of witnesses, their statements, forensic evidence and a wide variety of other material.

Prior to this year’s discovery reforms, prosecutors were essentially able to force defendants to negotiate plea deals and prepare for trials without knowing what material was in the prosecutors’ hands, including evidence that might help exonerate them. To make matters worse, the old law forced defense lawyers to file written motions requesting that prosecutors turn over evidence. Those motions could be opposed and judges could deny them, again depriving defendants of crucial information.

The new reforms have removed the blindfold, which should make the discovery process much more open and fair. Some of the most important changes are as follows:

  • Prosecutors must automatically turn over all relevant evidence they possess. The defense does not have to file a request.
  • Prosecutors must turn over all available materials no later than 20 days after arraignment for persons in custody and 35 days for persons out of custody.
  • If a defendant facing felony charges is offered a plea deal prior to grand jury proceedings, evidence must be shared with him/her at least three days before the plea deal expires. If the plea deal is offered at any other stage of the case, evidence must be turned over at least seven days before the deal expires.
  • If a defendant decides to testify at a grand jury proceeding, the prosecution must provide the defense team with any statements made to law enforcement by the defendant at least 48 hours before the grand jury testimony.
  • Information possessed by law enforcement is treated as if it is possessed by the prosecution. Therefore, delays in a prosecutor obtaining evidence from law enforcement is not a valid excuse for missing discovery deadlines.

Defense lawyers and advocacy groups had fought for decades to have the law changed. According to criminal justice nonprofit The Marshall Project, New York’s discovery laws have been among of the most restrictive in the nation, often keeping discovery from the defense until just before trial.

The Law Office of James L. Riotto welcomes these sorely needed changes. Our Rochester and Albany criminal defense lawyers are already using the new law to protect the rights of our clients. If you are accused of a crime or have questions about criminal procedure in general, please call us at 866-772-2122 or contact us online today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

James L. Riotto Attorney Photo
James L. Riotto
Criminal Defense Lawyer

James L. Riotto is an accomplished criminal defense attorney serving clients in New York. With an extensive background in law enforcement and criminal prosecution, his approach to each case is unique and informed by years of experience with the New York criminal justice system. As a graduate from Albany Law School and before going on to start his own practice, James worked at the Albany County District Attorney's Office, where he helped prosecute many DWI offenses. His inside knowledge of the tactics used to gain convictions provides him with a particular advantage when defending against DUI and other criminal charges.

Adam D. Staier Attorney Photo
Adam D. Staier
Of Counsel

About Attorney Adam Staier has spent the last seven years practicing criminal defense law throughout upstate New York and the Capital Region. He began his legal career through internships in civil law, indigent legal representation and federal energy law regulation. Finding a passion in criminal law, Mr. Staier held internships handling both prosecution and defense…

William M. Swift Attorney Photo
William M. Swift
Associate Attorney

About William M. Swift is an associate attorney at the Law Office of James L. Riotto and brings 20 years of experience to our clients. His practice focuses on personal injury cases and criminal matters. He has successfully represented individuals in felony, misdemeanor cases. Additionally, he has extensive knowledge in DMV administrative proceedings involving suspensions…

  • What to do if pulled over for a DUI


    How to deal with a DWI traffic stop

    How you handle getting pulled over for a DUI/DWI can significantly affect your defense down the road. For instance, declining the officer's request to search your vehicle and avoiding specific answers when asked about any substances you may have consumed could help you when combating DUI/DWI charges in court.
    READ MORE
Reviews and Ratings
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Recently I have dealt with my ticket from United States being from Canada ....I was totally unaware how would I deal with the situation being in Canada , so I Google and found James Riotto office , after approaching Natasha Crawford and Brian persons...

    Read more

    QAISER QARI

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    The Law Office of James L. Riotto, recently handled a speeding ticket for me. I was stopped for doing 74 MPH in a 45. I did not realize the limit had dropped that much. I was concerned about points on my license, and higher insurance costs resulting ...

    Read more

    Michael McGuire

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    The legal team at this law firm were very responsive when ever i needed a question answered or anything i needed. Destinee kessler was definitely the G.O.A.T tho she. She was going above and beyond to make sure i was always on my A game, and was prep...

    Read more

    Speed 585 (wavyjonesBeats)

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    We called the Law Office of James Riotto after we had a car accident. Within one call they summed up how they would handle the situation for us. We paid the fee upfront and they got to work. They told us exactly what information they needed from us a...

    Read more

    Monique b

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Both me and my friend get a really satisfied result for our traffic ticket at this office. They are very proffesional and trustworthy. I would definately recommand them for anyone who needs legal help.

    Read more

    Edward Jiazhen Tan

See all reviews
Contact us

Quick Contact Form